HP G5320fr

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP G5320fr (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120105
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '18 at 15:40
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 294 39% 295 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 30 Parallax 39.1 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 34.4 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70 10,510 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: O072 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 94 107 101 91 51 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.7% Below average	Read 180 Write 115 Mixed 49.9 SusWrite 92.6 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 13.1 46% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 85 DQ Mixed 95.5 74% 103 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 90%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB 872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 9GB free Firmware: 3.AHG SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 40 Write 40.7 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 37.9 28% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 9801AD80 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.5 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G5320fr Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP G5320fr

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	22x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	2x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 9801 99U5471-020.A00LF M378B5773CH0-CH9 9801 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GBCE80CE80Bench 29%, 4 samples	3x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 2C802C80 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 0207 51264T160K0000NYA0 16GBCE80CE80Bench 31%, 2 samples	2x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBAD80AD80Bench 32%, 148 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16