Acer TravelMate X483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer TravelMate X483  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MA40_HX
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 07:54
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2117U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 98.3
48% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 94.7
8-Core 96.4
13% 95.6 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0712) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xstar 120G 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150818
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 136 139 139 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 423
Write 134
Mixed 153
SusWrite 137
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 8.9
50% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 58.9
63% 104 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN- 0 4GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate X483 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer TravelMate X483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback