Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '18 at 19:03
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 628
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 168
Parallax 176
122% 165 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 174
Splatting 114
110% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 1286 793 512 517 521 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 1,426
Mixed 708
SusWrite 830
268% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.9
185% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 447
383% 578 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 211%
Great: 283%
Intel X25-M 80GB
15GB free
Firmware: 2CV102G9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 21 74 78 70 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 240
Write 75.5
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 47
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 10.3
42% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 32.9
44% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 44%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
90GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 246 247 248 249 250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 460
Write 246
Mixed 154
SusWrite 247
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 24.3
106% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 56.6
95% 187 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5TB
399GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 34 42 40 7.7 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 75.5
Write 66.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 27.3
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.3
269% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 43 51 37 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 57.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 40.5
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 20.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback