Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1J8

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1J8 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '18 at 06:41
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 150 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 221 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M 2,241 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA33) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.18.13.5005 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 1.78 4% 3.81 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 5.43 4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 268 276 277 259 256 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 431 Write 255 Mixed 181 SusWrite 266 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 25.7 95% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 118 124% 206 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 18 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-1J8 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1J8

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	6x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	1x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
JAJS300M240C 240GBBench 71%, 1,437 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GBMicronBench 37%, 222 samples	3x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 6GBUnknownBench 40%, 86 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16