Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 23:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 756
79% 631 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 114
Parallax 99
90% 108 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 100
Splatting 101
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 380 375 377 373 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 365
Write 372
Mixed 291
SusWrite 341
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 41.3
171% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 311
238% 321 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 83%
Kingdian S280 240GB
12GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 78 77 79 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 91
Write 94
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 79
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D4U2133M/8GB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2464 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback