TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 14:26
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 707
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 83.2%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 853C) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 40
39% 44.4 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 36.8
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 36.4%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1272 300 302 301 301 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,936
Write 1,449
Mixed 731
SusWrite 462
254% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 55.1
215% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 650
573% 861 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 214%
 Great: 236%
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
221GB free
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 146 191 197 206 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 384
Write 257
Mixed 273
SusWrite 177
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 36.8
144% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 145
141% 225 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 81.9%
 Great: 93%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 118
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 69.3%
 Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3333 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 34
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 122%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,448x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples309x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples283x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples235x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples235x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples202x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples190x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples190x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 276%, 367,854 samples179x
RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples205x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples143x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $129Bench 91%, 87,239 samples134x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback