Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 139 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 206 29% 212 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 41.3 28% 36.1 fps	MRender 31.4 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 35.3 27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: FJK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 37 34 39 52 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 93.5 Write 74 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 42.5 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	87x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	69x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	8x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 4x2GBSamsungBench 57%, 306 samples	7x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87