Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B360M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 10:51
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 725
76% 608 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2297 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 70
64% 76.5 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 74.3
62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0627A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 43 51 48 46 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 496
Write 394
Mixed 26
SusWrite 94.4
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 5.3
55% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
25% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 83%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
425GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 181 178 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 178
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 179
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08JEEE36-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback