Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 04:34
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.95 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 163
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 527
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1697 MHz, MLim: 1165 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 96
Parallax 255
85% 152 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 129
Splatting 135
100% 119 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 402 240 335 415 415 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 468
Write 395
Mixed 322
SusWrite 344
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 38.9
133% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 46.8
48% 78 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 108%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
8GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 88 83 77 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 295
Write 102
Mixed 155
SusWrite 82.9
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 30.5
111% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 82.5
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 98.2
74% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 18
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback