Asus N53SN

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus N53SN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53SN
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 20:17
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469 4,317 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 363 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1712) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 1.66 2% 3.15 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 118GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 118 112 70 70 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 368 Write 213 Mixed 252 SusWrite 93.8 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 21.4 74% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 84.1 68% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 73%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 13GB free Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 430 Write 427 Mixed 353 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 30.5 102% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 210 183% 271 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 2x8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53SN Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SN

CPU
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	119x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	30x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	16x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	120x
GeForce GT 550MNvidiaBench 4%, 926 samples	48x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $78Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	11x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	8x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16