Asus K53SV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K53SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SV
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 20:11
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 412
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Asus(1043 15F2) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.75
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 0.09
2% 3.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 192GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 90 93 101 102 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 296
Write 292
Mixed 246
SusWrite 97.6
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 19
62% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 74.2
61% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
83GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 85 87 95 98 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 464
Write 421
Mixed 326
SusWrite 92.7
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 30.4
106% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 238
193% 271 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 108%
SD Card 32GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 22 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 21.9
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 22.8
32% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SV Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback