MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 05:41
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 620
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1464 MHz, MLim: 1864 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 97.3
65% 84 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 59.6
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 117 116 120 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 117
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 33.7
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback