Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 2,254 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	26.2% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 29.7 2-Core 56 25% 40.7 Pts	4-Core 93.2 8-Core 93.9 12% 93.6 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 41%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 69 70 68 69 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 81.5 Write 87.5 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 68.9 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 149% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	31x
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 38%, 1,544 samples	5x
A8-8600P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 33%, 146 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	20x
Radeon R6AMDBench 4%, 343 samples	6x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,569 samples	6x

SSD
LDH-256V2S 256GBLiteonBench 70%, 104 samples	3x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	2x
MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 49%, 3,311 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	10x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GBRAMAXELBench 42%, 3,176 samples	6x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16