To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '18 at 18:53
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom 330 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 43.3 1-Core 7 2-Core 14.1 18% 21.5 Pts	4-Core 22.9 8-Core 23.2 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 23.4 1% 23.4 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA A108) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 0.31 1% 1.06 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75 2,837 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 42 37 34 38 43 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 41.2 Write 42.1 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 37.7 28% 38 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 32%
Fujitsu MHY2200BH 200GB-$46 859 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 181GB free Firmware: 0000000B SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 40 34 38 44 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 46.6 Write 37.7 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 38.6 28% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5429-007.A00LF 2x2GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM 2048 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	724x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	282x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	269x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16