Acer Aspire E5-576

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-576  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Ironman_SK
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 09:42
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 182
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 268
42% 302 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ160000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 104 98 129 143 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 388
Write 102
Mixed 10
SusWrite 113
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 17.1
47% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 40
41% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 55%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 126GB
57GB free, PID 00b2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 90 81 91 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 124
Write 46.2
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 86.9
78% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.6
133% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
71GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 48 42 41 42 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 132
Write 86.2
Mixed 86
SusWrite 48.4
110% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.1
152% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-576 Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-576

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback