Asus UX31E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAsus UX31E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX31E
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111008
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 07 '16 at 09:04
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2557M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 29
22% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 44.5
6% 44.7 Pts
64-Core 40
2% 40 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1427) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XM11 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 322ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 60%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
735GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 85.9
Mixed 72.1
100% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.23
62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX31E Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX31E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback