Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 02:45
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 130
61% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 368
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 89.2
51% 72 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 55.1
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 226 63 74 63 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 416
Write 354
Mixed 330
SusWrite 140
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 15.4
82% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.1
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 20.9
53% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
679GB free
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 90.4
Write 59.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 94.7
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 190 191 190 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 193
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 191
111% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.6 4.2 7.2 6.3 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 5.4
19% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 10%
Intenso Speed Line 32GB
22GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 24 20 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 24
Write 7.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 21.1
20% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 23%
Seagate M3 2TB
487GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 86 86 85 88 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
Read 48.6
Write 87.5
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 84
88% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 R5 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback