Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 21:07
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 126
55% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 171
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (80 fps cap detected)
63.6% Good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 80.2
66% 80.6 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 65.4
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 169 173 172 184 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 367
Write 329
Mixed 305
SusWrite 206
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 44.9
150% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 43.5
81% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 124%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB
3GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.8 6.3 5.7 5.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 4
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.7
7% 5.98 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 7%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
1GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 3.5 2.6 3.8 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3
7% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 9%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 14.6
110% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
500GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 111 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 155
Write 147
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 111
157% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback