Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '14 at 15:31
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 163
49% 113 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 573
50% 425 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 63% Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
125GB free
Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 354
Write 162
Mixed 169
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 16.3
62% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 49.2
53% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48%
Great: 103%
OCZ Agility2 120GB
36GB free
Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 179
Write 83.7
Mixed 94.6
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 15.3
84% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 33.6
41% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 54%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
431GB free
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 75.6
Mixed 48.2
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.34
103% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
290GB free
Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 133
Write 98.5
Mixed 120
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.48
99% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
290GB free
Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 127
Write 103
Mixed 101
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.61
106% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
31GB free, PID 022e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 88.9
Mixed 13.5
74% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.21
69% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 36%
Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback