Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 10:58
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 146
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 327
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 9.78
11% 11.9 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 14
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 49 0.8 3.7 105 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 327
Write 89
Mixed 173
SusWrite 35.5
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 11.3
39% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 37.1
26% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 53%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 150 152 156 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 153
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 84%
WDC WD16 00BEVT-22A23T0 160GB
68GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 36 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 33.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 37.6
44% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback