MSI MS-1812

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GT80 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1812  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 08:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5950HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 623
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
MSI(1462 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.7% Good
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 50.4
81% 68.1 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 50.8
44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 492 490 488 479 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 736
Mixed 420
SusWrite 476
144% 645 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 29.8
107% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 262
236% 350 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 117%
Great: 332%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
835GB free
Firmware: 2BC10008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 98.4
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G1600L2S Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1302 PSD38G1600L2S Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1812 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1812

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback