MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7597
MotherboardMSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 75
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 94.5
46% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 142
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8417) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.13
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 179 185 181 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 233
Write 184
Mixed 162
SusWrite 181
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 20.5
67% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 43.9
41% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
147GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 100 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 124
Write 99.2
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 100
64% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GF615M-P33 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI GF615M-P33 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback