Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 738
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 946
59% 946 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 80.8
54% 71.2 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 55.7
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 90 96 91 53 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 377
Write 224
Mixed 319
SusWrite 92.7
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 16.5
99% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 25
68% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
204GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 108
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback