Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '18 at 10:11
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 23.4 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 192 51% 103 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 330 40% 310 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.78 2% 1.86 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 1.83 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 943 334 335 332 333 333 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,629 Write 1,216 Mixed 480 SusWrite 435 208% 940 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 40.3 144% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 704 DQ Write 411 DQ Mixed 466 372% 527 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 558GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 155 156 156 155 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 146 Write 134 Mixed 90.4 SusWrite 155 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 19.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 296 14% 296 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	250x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	118x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	115x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	78x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $351

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16