Lenovo 10093

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10093  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120912
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 08:28
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2130-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 130
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 209
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1642 3A98) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 2
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 172 185 146 103 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 254
Write 237
Mixed 213
SusWrite 160
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 25.6
85% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 143
119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58
77GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 61 67 61 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 90.1
Write 94.7
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 61.8
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 104%
ST4000DM 001-1FK17N 4TB
769GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 36 36 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 36.2
97% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 0.6
383% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
440% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 75%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 131
Write 105
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 0.3
95% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 61%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
453GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 83 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 161
Write 134
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 83.2
147% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
153GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 68.1
Write 71
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 1
60% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
544GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 84 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 188
Write 149
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 83.8
157% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 36 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 182
Write 175
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 35.6
134% 110 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
214GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 36 34 35 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 192
Write 168
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 35.7
132% 110 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
78% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
195GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 36 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 164
Write 148
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 35.5
119% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
68% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10093 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10093

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback