Toshiba dynabook Satellite B551/E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba dynabook Satellite B551/E  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 08:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 80.7
47% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 139
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 0007) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.91
2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 200 217 228 229 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 198
Write 194
Mixed 204
SusWrite 219
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 29.1
88% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 153
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 57%
Great: 128%
TOSHIBA MK2575GSX 250GB
198GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 11.6
Write 8.7
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 27.9
25% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dynabook Satellite B551/E Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba dynabook Satellite B551/E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback