Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 14:46
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 228
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,052
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2884) 3GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 47% Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6068
Write 6,122
Mixed 5,704
1,333% 5,965 MB/s
4K Read 418
4K Write 322
4K Mixed 55.8
875% 265 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 746
544% 708 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 490 490 389 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 462
SusWrite 440
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57.8
195% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: AN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 193 197 198 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 190
Mixed 101
SusWrite 196
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
248% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: AN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 194 199 199 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 176
Mixed 105
SusWrite 197
124% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Corsair Voyager Mini 3.0 64GB
7GB free, PID 1a0c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 19 20 22 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 42.7
Write 39.7
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 20.4
38% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.9
125% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 57.2
MC Mixed 31.9
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback