Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 114
53% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 340
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 16 17 12 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 63.1
Write 53.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 13.4
34% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 49%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
121GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 26 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 73.7
Write 72.9
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 22.9
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
403GB free
Firmware: LVM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 106 106 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 51.1
Write 91
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 107
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback