Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7600 6 User benchmarks, average bench 37% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 53.1 33% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 50.9 8-Core 53.6 7% 52.2 Pts	64-Core 51.2 3% 51.2 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba RAID LD0 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 100 85 87 104 80 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	Read 102 Write 98.2 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 87.4 21% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 19.2 64% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 25.6 20% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 30%
Toshiba RAID LD1 500GB 333GB free Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 86 85 84 88 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.6% Average	Read 81.5 Write 62 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 84.3 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.63 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16