Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '18 at 12:45
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4667 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 179
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 698
63% 529 Pts
64-Core 3,772
233% 3,772 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1644 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 127
Parallax 116
93% 119 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 107
Splatting 99.3
84% 104 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 437
Mixed 373
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 41.2
136% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 232
176% 237 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
51GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 131 137 140 146 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 138
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
576GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 182 181 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 172
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 181
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 48GB
2400, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 21.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $627
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback