Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141209
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '18 at 22:29
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 134 58% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 202 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 285-$189 6,276 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 0486) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 44.4 Reflection 48.9 Parallax 49.8 36% 47.7 fps	MRender 48.6 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 34.7 32% 40.5 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 57 51 54 54 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 448 Write 397 Mixed 299 SusWrite 82.4 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 43.5 152% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 146 137% 213 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 91GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 96 95 94 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 150 Write 143 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 94.3 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB 903 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.1% Average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 17.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 13.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	26x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	12x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 456 samples	3x
F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 197 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16