ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compaq-presario KX752AA-ABU SR5501UK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Windows Vista is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (2GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario KX752AA-ABU SR5501UK (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Boston
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows Vista
BIOS Date	20080430
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '16 at 23:41
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E1200 387 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 33 1-Core 12.8 2-Core 29.9 17% 25.2 Pts	4-Core 25.2 8-Core 34.4 4% 29.8 Pts	64-Core 33 2% 33 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2149 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 229568335 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15178 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2108 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 606142500 (C2) HDA temperature 36 45 55834574884 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 71 67 213162560 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	29.7% Poor	Read 54.1 Write 49.5 Mixed 47.9 38% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.29 49% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 42%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 25GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 25 Write 22.4 Mixed 24.1 30% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.17 54% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.96% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.83 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 0.2 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback