EXO EXOMATE N4

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	EXO EXOMATE N4 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Intel classmate PC
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '18 at 14:42
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3010 352 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Memory 23.8 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 35.4 17% 26.5 Pts	4-Core 35.4 8-Core 38.8 5% 37.1 Pts	64-Core 37.7 2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9809) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.27% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 2.12 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.22 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.27% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB 3,097 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 86 89 91 92 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 381 Write 369 Mixed 336 SusWrite 105 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 22 73% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 95.4 DQ Write 76.5 DQ Mixed 87.2 65% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 13 12 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	9.28% Terrible	Read 37.2 Write 22.2 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 12.3 22% 19 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x4GB 4,437 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 294 14% 294 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXOMATE N4 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: EXO EXOMATE N4

CPU
Celeron N3010IntelBench 24%, 352 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 4,437 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16