Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '18 at 04:33
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 159 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 615 62% 504 Pts	64-Core 752 46% 752 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 182 Parallax 199 135% 182 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 181 Splatting 123 116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 446 Write 447 Mixed 388 95% 427 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 40 132% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 364 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 43GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 66 68 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 81 Write 78.7 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 67.6 54% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 84%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 69GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 91 91 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 91.2 Mixed 66 SusWrite 91.6 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.3 226% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill F3-12800CL9-4 4x4GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 36 MC Mixed 33.7 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 9.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	109x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	49x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	44x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	36x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	27x

SSD
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	22x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	18x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	34x
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	31x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16