Asus Z97M-PLUS/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS/BR  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '16 at 01:04
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 524
66% 500 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 39.2
29% 35.7 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 36.4
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 405
Mixed 414
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 43.6
174% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 96.7
126% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
21GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 91.4
Write 70
Mixed 82.2
61% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.35
94% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
3GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 77.3
Write 73.3
Mixed 72.5
56% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.54
114% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 70%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 160GB
0GB free
Firmware: ZM100-47 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.2% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 55.4
Mixed 50.7
36% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.36
91% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 31%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
2GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 4.49
Write 79.3
Mixed 75.8
84% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.33
71% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 18GB
1355, 1355, 1355, 1355 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS/BR Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback