Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '18 at 11:55
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 87 2-Core 193 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 374 48% 364 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 51% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 47 39 38 43 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 466 Write 154 Mixed 129 SusWrite 46.5 43% 199 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 27.5 103% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 97 109% 193 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 174 173 171 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 152 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 172 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 337GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 119 118 118 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 120 Write 106 Mixed 63 SusWrite 118 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 8313 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 8313 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 8313 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,537x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	955x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	563x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	311x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	274x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	238x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	141x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	91x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16