HP 810-145qe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 810-145qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 19:46
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 584
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 146
Parallax 139
112% 141 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 404 282 285 279 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 440
Write 424
Mixed 312
SusWrite 326
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 33.4
110% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 244
207% 304 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 135 137 136 138 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 101
Mixed 73
SusWrite 136
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
796GB free
Firmware: 0701
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 19
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 28.5
19% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 112%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB
3GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Read 17
Write 4.8
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.2
9% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 8%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
10GB free, PID 0059
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.7 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 21
Write 12.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 10.1
15% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99924-15- Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-145qe Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-145qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback