PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150804 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '18 at 18:48 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
94.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 150 129 118 119 116 MB/s
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 156 156 157 156 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $783 |