Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '18 at 15:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 125
60% 95 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 187
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3981) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.98 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 37 116 18 9.5 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 301
Write 101
Mixed 277
SusWrite 65.6
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 19.3
82% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 134
132% 206 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
302GB free
Firmware: JE3Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 74 72 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 91.8
Write 87.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 74.5
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback