TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '18 at 15:04
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 107
2-Core 203
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 637
60% 499 Pts
64-Core 893
55% 893 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 70.5%
 Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3753) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 113
Parallax 97.7
93% 108 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 102
82% 99 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 89.2%
 Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 128 114 124 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 296
Write 199
Mixed 241
SusWrite 118
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 39.2
139% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 152
122% 171 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 70.3%
 Great: 85%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
235GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 101 108 110 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 106
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 63.1%
 Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 110 115 115 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 115
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 65.6%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 89%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD  $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples54x
GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia  $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples45x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples43x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples41x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples13x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples14x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $444
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback