Asus N53Jq

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus N53Jq (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53Jq
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101105
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '16 at 19:18
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 104 58% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 238 27% 211 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1522) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.5942 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.71% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.84 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 2.48 2% 3.22 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.71% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 355GB free Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 91 90 2852 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3316 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1375 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1735 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 49 223339151385 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 15 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 5 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 20043	57.7% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 105 Mixed 96.2 75% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.35 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 187 153 1641 (04) Start/Stop count 62 62 38253 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4862 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2670 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 1739 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 117 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 892696 (C2) HDA temperature 120 106 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	35.5% Below average	Read 61.4 Write 62.2 Mixed 60.2 46% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.35 80% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 43%
SAMSUNG HN-M320MBB 320GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 245GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 20.5 Mixed 23.8 30% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.53 4K Mixed 0.33 31% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BF160B.C8FE 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 859B CT25664BF160B.C8FE 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.8% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53Jq Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53Jq

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	42x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x
Core i7 X 940Intel $150Bench 60%, 592 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	45x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	3x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	5x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 3x2GBAsintBench 36%, 71 samples	4x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16