Apple Macmini6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemApple Macmini6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-031AEE4D24BFF0B1
Memory5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '16 at 14:34
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 136
57% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 174
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4226
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 7.65
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 512
Write 200
Mixed 249
70% 320 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 25.4
84% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 72.2
92% 166 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Macmini6,1 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback