Asrock G31M-S.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock G31M-S.  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '16 at 13:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 54.1
35% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 103
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B E208) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 55.7
37% 43.5 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 37.1
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.1% Above average
Read 244
Write 210
Mixed 185
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 16.1
99% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 15.9
25% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 86%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB
43GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 29
36% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.36
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31M-S. Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G31M-S.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback