AMD Dibbler

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAMD Dibbler  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Dibbler
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: ZE1807C3T4MFB_37/33_Y
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 189
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 596
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 27.6
17% 21.9 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 21
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 490
Write 402
Mixed 408
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 20.5
107% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 20.2
24% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 122%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
475GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 63
Write 82.9
Mixed 68
95% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.18
53% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 31.1
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 27.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback