Asus M32CD

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$68 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 207 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 402 54% 402 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 340 219 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 869E) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 10.4 7% 9.33 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 8.3 6% 7.92 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2542 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 351 (64) Unknown 100 100 1364704 (65) Unknown 100 100 220128 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 402 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1326 (B7) Unknown 99 99 5 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 154619674657 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2415 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1032 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1969 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2790 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	55.9% Above average	Read 460 Write 248 Mixed 252 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 9.56 72% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 30 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 8.98 16% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G 99U5584-009.A00LF 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $68Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	189x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	87x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	9x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	51x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	64x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	23x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 63 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $96

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16