Foxconn G31MXP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn G31MXP  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '18 at 00:36
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 87.8
44% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 86.9
8-Core 86.2
12% 86.6 Pts
64-Core 86.5
5% 86.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Gigabyte(1458 368C) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 223
Write 131
Mixed 82.4
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 8.53
55% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 46.9
DQ Mixed 7.62
14% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 82%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
180GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65% Good
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 107
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.56
144% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65%
Great: 77%
Samsung HM502JX 500GB
170GB free
Firmware: 2AC1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 32.4
Mixed 32.6
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 45%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
186GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 73
Write 80.4
Mixed 36.3
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31MXP Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn G31MXP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback