Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 21:32
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 477
56% 431 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1775 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 117
Parallax 116
92% 115 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 102
Splatting 93
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 373
Write 235
Mixed 285
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 24.7
102% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 62.9
72% 125 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 114%
OCZ VERTEX 128GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1.6 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 230
Write 181
Mixed 181
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 9.03
4K Mixed 6.68
57% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 66.8
DQ Write 9.34
DQ Mixed 6.2
13% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
822GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 140
Write 88.9
Mixed 103
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.45
99% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 50.3
80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback