PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170710 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 24 '18 at 14:16 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
36%
Below average
|
||||
73.9%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $92Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 359x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 351x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 267x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 212x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 196x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 162x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $409 |