Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 04:15
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 388
55% 407 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 7.22
4% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6.78
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 435
Mixed 550
186% 858 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 14.1
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 34.6
DQ Mixed 8.06
12% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 113%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB-$29
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 30.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback