HP 500-521no

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP 500-521no  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B35
Memory5.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '18 at 19:40
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 74
2-Core 132
59% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 218
30% 217 Pts
64-Core 219
15% 219 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.53
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.45 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 7.57
Splatting 8.39
6% 8.02 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
481GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 171
Write 142
Mixed 158
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback